Legal Opinion

Baim & Blank, Inc. v. Philco Corporation

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 24, 1957No. Civ. A. 14083PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendants for an order, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for summary judgment to dismiss the first cause of action as against Philco Corporation, and so much of the first cause of action as to Philco Distributors, Inc., as relates to matters which occurred prior to September 1, 1950.

The first cause of action alleges that from November 20, 1926 to July 3, 1952, plaintiff, Bairn & Blank, Inc., operated a retail store in Brooklyn, selling radios, television sets and household appliances. The action has been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Philip Klein v. The Lionel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sanitary Milk Producers v. Bergjans Farm Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  2. American News Company and the Union News Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Thomas M. Brewer v. Uniroyal, Inc., and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  4. Mendel Schwimmer D/B/A Supersonic Electronics Co. v. Sony Corporation of America and Sony CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. Caribe Bmw, Inc. v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AktiengesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API