Legal Opinion
Caribe Bmw, Inc. v. Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 25, 1994No. 93-1653PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREYER, Chief Judge.
This appeal raises two issues of antitrust law. First, do a firm’s wholly owned subsidiary and the firm itself amount to a “single seller” under the Robinson-Patman Act? 15 U.S.C. § 13. Second, can a retailer’s lost profit, brought about by a maximum resale price fixing agreement between that retailer and its' supplier, amount to an “antitrust injury,” thereby giving that retañer “standing” to obtain treble damages? Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co. (“ARCO”), 495 U.S. 328, 110 S.Ct. 1884, 109 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990); Albrecht v. Herald Co., 390 U.S. 145, 88 S.Ct. 869,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- American Ad Management, Inc. v. General Telephone Company Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Coastal Fuels of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Caribbean Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Podiatrist Ass'n, Inc. v. La Cruz Azul De Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Barkat U. Khan and Khan & Associates, Inc. v. State Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.