Legal Opinion

Edson v. Gates

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1880PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Bay. Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

The questions raised in this case must be determined principally on a construction of the written agreements in the light of what preceded and what was done under them. The referee found that in the summer of 1876 the assignees of the plaintiffs, Amos and Gilbert Johnson, were copartners under the firm name of Johnson Bros.; that defendants were partners under the firm name of Gates & Fay; that in the summer of 1876 these two firms agreed to purchase a certain lot of pine lands then owned by Evans, Kilmaster & Co., and that Gates & Fay should negotiate such purchase ; that, in the event of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lind v. WebberNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Goss v. LaninSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Jackson v. HooperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
  4. Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Polk v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API