Legal Opinion

Goss v. Lanin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 9, 1915PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from Chickasaw District Court. — Hon. A. N. Hobson, Judge. Action for an accounting. Opinion states the facts.—

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

This is an action in equity for an accounting. The first petition filed was based upon the claim that the plaintiff and defendants were a co-partnership for the purpose of promoting a railroad in the state of Texas. An amendment was filed to this petition after some of the evidence had been taken, and this amendment seems to base a right for an accounting upon the theory that these parties had entered into an agreement for a joint adventure for the construction of a railroad in the state of Texas, or if not a joint adventure, an employment of agency was created and agreed to between the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Grumley v. WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  3. Jackson v. HooperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
  4. McCreery v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Ross v. WillettNew York Supreme Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Sample v. RomineMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Denny v. GuytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Ditis v. Ahlvin Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hoge v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  5. San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. American Milling & Industrial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API