Jackson v. Hooper
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
Howell, Y. C.
The theory of the bill in this case is that Walter M. Jackson and Horace E. Hooper are and' for a number of years have been partners in business. The bill is filed for the purpose of dissolving the partnership and for an accounting of all the partnership affairs. It also prays for an injunction to restrain the defendants, Horace E. Hooper, Harris E. Burrows, Charles C. Whinery and Eranklin H. Hooper from transferring or disposing of some shares of stock standing in the names of the said Harris B. Burrows, Charles C. Whinery and Franklin H. Hooper, on the books of two…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marston v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Getty v. . DevlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Hambleton v. RhindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Knapp v. HanleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Hurley v. WaltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Keyes v. NimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Goss v. LaninSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Dexter & Carpenter, Inc. v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Tompkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- First Mechanics Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.