Legal Opinion
James Howard Jones, AKA Richard Burdon v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 26, 1967No. 20231_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
James Howard Jones appeals from a judgment, based on a jury verdict, convicting him of the offense of transporting a stolen motor vehicle in interstate commerce in violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312 (1964).
The jury could have found that while Jones was in Louisville, Kentucky, one Jimmy Namchek, also in Louisville, stole a passenger automobile, and that Jones, knowing that the vehicle had been stolen, drove with Namchek to California in the automobile, where California license plates were attached to it.
Appellant argues that the trial court incorrectly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fred John Corey and Mary Carolyn Fulghum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Morandy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- William K. Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Ronald James Lawrence v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Stuart Joseph Berlin, United States of America v. Frank Joseph DesapioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- James Kenneth Julian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Troy Arthur Burke, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.