Legal Opinion

United States v. Stuart Joseph Berlin, United States of America v. Frank Joseph Desapio

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 2, 1973No. 72-1924, 72-2004PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

' This appeal from conviction under the Dyer Act 1 raises the question: Under what circumstances can interstate transportation of a stolen car by a purchaser (innocent of knowledge that the car was stolen) be said to have been willfully caused by the seller so as to render him guilty of a Dyer Act violation 2 under 18 U.S.C. § 2(b).

Section 2(b) states: “Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.” Appellants were parties to an interstate conspiracy…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Nelson v. O'NEILSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. William Clyde LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Daniel Michael Daly, Harold Dean Klemp, Joseph Diaz, Gene Floyd Criswell, and Michael Richard RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Harry F. Larson, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Bruce Warren Hobson, United States of America v. Morton NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Henry Albert Smith, United States of America v. Roderick Ashley SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API