Legal Opinion

Fred John Corey and Mary Carolyn Fulghum v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1962No. 17566PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

The defendants were tried before a jury and convicted of violating the Mail Fraud Act (18 U.S.C. § 1342) and the National Stolen Property Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 and 2315), and of conspiring to violate those Acts (18 U.S.C. § 371). They have appealed, urging error in the admission of certain evidence and insufficiency of the evidence as a whole. We affirm.

The evidence may be summarized as follows:

A large quantity of jewelry was stolen from a jewelry store in Las Vegas, Nevada on May 31,1960. On June 20, 1960, defendants Mary Fulghum and Fred Corey were seen together at…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. United States v. FleischmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. George Herman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Eddie Odom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. Peter Licavoli, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Edward H. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  5. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Fitzgerald LovellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API