Fred John Corey and Mary Carolyn Fulghum v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge.
The defendants were tried before a jury and convicted of violating the Mail Fraud Act (18 U.S.C. § 1342) and the National Stolen Property Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 and 2315), and of conspiring to violate those Acts (18 U.S.C. § 371). They have appealed, urging error in the admission of certain evidence and insufficiency of the evidence as a whole. We affirm.
The evidence may be summarized as follows:
A large quantity of jewelry was stolen from a jewelry store in Las Vegas, Nevada on May 31,1960. On June 20, 1960, defendants Mary Fulghum and Fred Corey were seen together at…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. FleischmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- George Herman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Eddie Odom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Peter Licavoli, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Edward H. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Fitzgerald LovellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.