Gunder v. Tibbits
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom the Wells Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
Action by Dora Troxell against appellants for damages. Complaint in two paragraphs. Motion by each appellant to make the complaint more specific, motion by each appellant to require plaintiff to state her causes of action in separate paragraphs and number them, and separate demurrers for want of facts and for misjoinder of causes of action, by each appellant to each paragraph of complaint, were overruled. Appellants separately filed answers of general denial and of the two years statute of limitations. Reply in *593denial. Motion by appellants for continuance overruled. Request by appellants for…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Woodward v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Illinois Central Railroad v. CheekIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Tewksbury v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Montgomery v. CrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
- Watts v. ChittendenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Miller v. CoulterIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.