Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Griffin

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 25, 1984No. 0208PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

In this personal injury action, Henry Daniel Griffin appeals claiming that the trial court erred in not granting his motions for directed verdict and judgment non obstante ver-edicto and in granting Benjamin Franklin Griffin’s motion for a new trial after a jury returned a verdict in favor of Franklin and awarded him nominal sums for actual and punitive damages. Daniel also appeals the trial court’s order settling the record on appeal. We affirm the case on the merits but reverse and remand the settlement order.

His appeal raises the following questions: (1) whether Daniel was…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Freshwater v. BoothWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Schumpert v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  3. Farr v. Duke Power CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. Toole v. TooleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  5. Childers v. Gas Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ballou v. Sigma Nu General FraternityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Wallace v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Christiansen v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Broom Ex Rel. Broom v. Southeastern Highway Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Anderson v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API