Hogs Unlimited v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
This case raises questions about whether and under what circumstances two innocent partners may recover under a casualty insurance policy for partnership property intentionally destroyed by the third partner. The courts below allowed recovery for two-thirds of the property loss, plus prejudgment interest. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Hogs Unlimited is a general partnership, consisting of three partners, Dennis Bremer, Curtis Zillgitt, and Raymond Cerise. The partnership was in the business of raising pigs and had approximately 250 breeding sows. The animals…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Steigler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- Morgan v. Cincinnati InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Fiorangelo Spezialetti and Lorraine Spezialetti, Husband and Wife, D/B/A Spezi's Lorraine Spezialetti v. Pacific Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Ventura v. Titan Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Borman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.