Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Sequoyah Fuels Corp.

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1994No. 93-252-S, 93-514-SPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEAY, Chief Judge.

This is a consolidated action brought by plaintiffs against defendant, Sequoyah Fuels Corporation (“SFC”), pursuant to the provisions of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (the “WARN Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2109. The remaining plaintiffs in Case No. 93-252-S are Barbara Bradley, Linda Box, Stanley Brown, Jimmy Case- bolt, Phyllis Clay, Edward Elbon, John Fox, Johnny Galatian, Dixie Harl, Randy Maxwell, Arthur Pearson, Coletta Peyton, Janet Ross, Marty Ross, Mike Sutterfield, Sue Smith, Graham Swearingen, Lawrence White, and Jesse Wilkerson. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Kayser-Roth Hosiery, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
  2. Solberg v. Inline Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
  3. Damron v. Rob Fork Mining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Kildea v. Electro Wire Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allen v. Sybase, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Steven Scott Kildea v. Electro-Wire Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. Snider v. Commercial Financial Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2002
  4. University of Kentucky v. BunnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
  5. Weekes-Walker v. Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API