Legal Opinion
Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 15, 1947No. Civil Action No. 935PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, individually, and as agent and representative of other employees, commenced suit on October 19, 1945, to recover overtime compensation, liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees from defendant, pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 2938, § 1 et seq., 29 U.S.GA. § 201 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the Act.
Following motions by defendant (Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co., 5 F.R.D. 298), all unnamed employees herein were allowed twenty days to intervene or file written evidence of plaintiff’s authority to represent them in this proceeding. Defendant filed an…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- McClaine v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fox Chemical Co. v. Amsoil, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1978
- Buchholtz v. Swift & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
- Portlance v. Golden Valley State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
- Homewood Theatre, Inc. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.