Legal Opinion

Buchholtz v. Swift & Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1973No. 4-71-Civ. 602PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LARSON, District Judge.

This action arises out of the termination by defendant Swift & Company *585(hereinafter Swift) of the bulk of its operations at its South St. Paul meat packing plant in late 1969. Plaintiffs Charles N. Buchholtz and Lester J. Tauer, former Swift employees and members of the local labor union (P-167) at the South St. Paul plant, instituted this suit on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated against Swift and the International Union, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America (hereinafter Amalgamated).

Swift is being sued under §…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Summons v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. International Union of Electrical & Machine Workers v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Carter v. JerniganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. Fox Chemical Co. v. Amsoil, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API