Legal Opinion

City of Grand Rapids v. Welleman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to superior court of Grand Eapids. (Burlingame, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the ojDinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This cause was tried in the superior court of Grand Eapids before the court without a jury, and the court found the following facts and law:

“ FINDINGS OF FACT:
“1. That this is an action of assumpsit, brought by the city against Adrian Welleman to recover the sum of $318.20, assessed against said defendant for personal tax in the Third ward of said city of Grand Eapids for the year 1888.
“ 2. That said defendant was during the year 1888 and on the second Monday of April of said year, and for a long time prior thereto, an inhabitant and resident of the said Third ward of said city.
“3. That he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Case v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment No. 6California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Maurer v. WeatherbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  3. State v. Carney, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1939
  4. Keister v. GemuendMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API