Legal Opinion

Keister v. Gemuend

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 1, 1957No. Calendar 47,014Published

1Opinion of the CourtVoelker, J.

This is an, original proceeding in this Court by'which the plaintiffs and petitioners seeTr a writ of mandamus against the defendant Gemuend and ■ a writ ' of prohibition agáinst the defendant county board of supervisors, both of-which'have answered in opposition. No direct relief is • sought against the remaining 2 defendants, who are joined because of their interest in the proceedings. The city of Ionia joined with the defendant' Gemuend in answering in opposition to the petition.1' -The action purports, to be a class action: ,in which the plaintiff Keister (as supervisor of the second ward…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Messenger v. PeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Chamberlain v. City of St. IgnaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. City of Grand Rapids v. WellemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Auditor General v. GriffinMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API