Legal Opinion
State v. Carney
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
Decided April 13, 1939No. 23500PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By LEACH. J.'-
' ■ On motion- of defendant Edward T. Car*558ney filed March 10, 1939, to require the Prosecuting Attorney to comply with the order of the Court, heretofore entered directing that the indictment be divided into counts and that each count be separately stated and numbered; and on- motion of defendant James Angel Bolinger filed March 14, 1939. for an order requiring the Prosecuting Attorney to divide the counts-in the indictment and separately state and number them.
Pursuant to an order of the court made before the filing of either of said motions the Prosecuting Attorney…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. BirdsallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. MacDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- The People v. SweetinIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
- The People v. PatrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.