Maurer v. Weatherby
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
The plaintiff applied for a writ of mandate commanding the defendant as city treasurer of the city of Eureka to pay a warrant drawn in plaintiff’s favor by the proper officers of said city. A trial was had and judgment was entered directing that a peremptory writ of mandate issue commanding the defendant, as such treasurer, to pay the amount of the warrant.
The defendant appeals from said judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The warrant was drawn in payment for certain services performed under a written contract the validity of which is the bone of contention on this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lewis v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- La Grange Hydraulic Gold Mining Co. v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bardrick v. DillonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- City of Oakland v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- City of Grand Rapids v. WellemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Speer v. KratzensteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Arnold v. Custer CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- H. D. Haley & Co. v. McVayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Blair v. KuhrMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Tax Factors, Inc. v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.