Wesely v. Flor
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
Appellant Elaine Wesely alleges that she received negligent care from respondent dentist A. David Flor. In her dental malpractice action, Wesely submitted an affidavit disclosing the opinions of a doctor of internal medicine, not a dentist, in an attempt to satisfy the statutory requirement of expert disclosure. See Minn.Stat. § 145.682, subds. 2, 4 (2010). Flor moved to dismiss the claim under Minn.Stat. § 145.682, subd. 6 (2010), asserting that the affidavit was deficient because an internist is not a dentist and was not qualified to be an expert in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Lindberg v. Health Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Stroud v. Hennepin County Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Anderson v. RengacharySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. d/b/a ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- Pfeiffer ex rel. Pfeiffer v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Mario Mancini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
- Guzick v. KimballSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Julie L. Pfeiffer, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Dale R. Pfeiffer v. Allina Health System, d/b/a Allina Hospitals & Clinics Behavioral Health Services, and d/b/a United Hospital, Paul A. Ekberg, D. O., P. A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.