R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.

After stating the case: In this case both parties appealed to this Court from the judgment below, the defendant upon the ground that the land was not subject to condemnation under our statute which exempts certain property from the operation of the law. This view was rejected by the Court, the writer of this opinion dissenting. The plaintiff's contention that there were errors in the rulings and charge of the court below was sustained and a new trial ordered.

The first five errors, in our former decision, now assigned, may naturally be considered together, as if we were wrong in holding that…