Carolina Power and Light Company v. Clark
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The evidence of the individual defendants introduced without objection, except as to the testimony of Sam W. Huddleston set forth below, which was objected to on the ground that he had not qualified as an hydraulic engineer to express an opinion, tends to show the following facts. They own a farm of about 100 acres in Beaverdam Valley. Beaverdam Creek, a clear mountain stream about 14 to 16 feet wide and 10 to 18 inches deep, runs approximately through the center of the farm. On the north end of the farm is a narrow gorge 100 to 150 feet wide, where a dam could be placed to create a lake and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Ark. State Highway Comm. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Grimes v. VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- City of Statesville v. BowlesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.