Legal Opinion

Mulcahy v. Farmers Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2004No. 73647-2PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

Mary Mulcahy was injured in a car accident in British Columbia. She settled her claim with the other driver. The other driver’s insurer did not pay the whole settlement amount. Instead, it reduced its settlement payout by the amount of first party insurance coverage Mulcahy was entitled to receive under British Columbia’s universal compulsory automobile insurance law. It advised Mulcahy that her own insurance company was obligated to pay the difference. Mulcahy’s own insurer disagrees.

Primarily, we must decide whether Washington courts may enforce an agreement between a Washington insurer and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McKee v. AT & T CORP.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. McKee v. AT&T Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Erwin v. Cotter Health CentersWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Erwin v. Cotter Health Centers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Mohr v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API