Legal Opinion

Mohr v. Grant

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2005No. 74208-1PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

108 P.3d 768 (2005)

153 Wash.2d 812

Eliot B. MOHR, individually; Mohr & Company, Inc. d/b/a Kitchen Interior Showcase, Respondents,

v.

Tom GRANT and "Jane Doe" Grant, husband and wife, individually, and the marital community composed thereof; and Spokane Television, Inc., a Washington corporation d/b/a/ KXLY-TV, Petitioners.

No. 74208-1.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 13, 2004.

Decided March 24, 2005.

Laurel Hobbs Siddoway, Spokane, for Petitioners.

Ryan Marshall Beaudoin, Witherspoon Kelley Davenport & Toole PS, Spokane, for Respondents.

Bruce Edward Humble Johnson, Michele Lynn…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. RappSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Michael SommerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Woody v. StappCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Corey v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Momah v. BhartiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API