Legal Opinion
McKee v. AT&T Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 28, 2008No. 81006-1PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.
¶1 Michael McKee filed this class action suit, alleging AT&T wrongly charged him (and others) city utility surcharges and usurious late fees. When the Chelan County Superior Court found the dispute resolution provision of AT&T’s “Consumer Services Agreement” unconscionable and denied its motion to compel arbitration, AT&T appealed. The Court of Appeals, Division Three, certified the case to this court. We affirm the trial court and remand for further proceedings.
Facts
¶2 McKee lives near Wenatchee, Washington, and signed up for AT&T long distance phone service in November 2002. His monthly…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Chris Cardoni v. Prosperity BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Feeney v. Dell Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- David Johnson v. Keybank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.