Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Piedmont Mt. Airy Guano Co. v. Buchanan

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided February 25, 1926PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChinn, J.

In January, 1922, the plaintiff in error, Piedmont Mt. Airy Guano Company a manufacturer of commercial fertilizers, with its principal office in Baltimore, Md., through its general agent, G. H. Bundiek, entered into a contract with F. F. Buchanan, the defendant in error, a resident of Northampton county, Va., appointing said Buchanan its agent for the sale of said company’s fertilizers on commission. The contract, which was in writing and was only signed by Buchanan, and by Bundiek in behalf of the company, contains various *620terms and conditions, including specified prices for the several…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winston v. GordonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  2. Smyth Bros.-McCleary-McClellan Co. v. BeresfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Myers v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  4. Omohundro v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  5. Southern Amusement Co. v. Ferrell-Bledsoe Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WeismanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  2. Centex Construction v. ACSTAR InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  3. W. L. Chase & Co. v. Norfolk National Bank of Commerce & TrustsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  4. Moore v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  5. Smith v. MountjoySupreme Court of Virginia · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API