Southern Amusement Co. v. Ferrell-Bledsoe Furniture Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of city of Danville in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.
[1] This was an action of assumpsit brought by the defendant in error, hereinafter called the furniture company, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter calléd the amusement company, on an open account. There were two trials of the case. At the first trial there was a verdict for the defendant which the trial court set aside on the motion of *431the plaintiff as contrary to the evidence, and the defendant excepted. At the second trial, the defendant offered no evidence, and there was a verdict for the plaintiff, which defendant moved to set aside, but the court overruled the motion and the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Owens v. Boyd Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1898
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lisk v. Criswell (In Re Criswell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1985
- Piedmont Mt. Airy Guano Co. v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1926
- Kern v. J. L. Barksdale Furniture Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- Marcuse v. Broad-Grace Arcade Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1935
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. A. M. Walkup Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.