Legal Opinion

Reclamation District No. 765 v. McPhee

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1910No. Civ. No. 639PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County. K. S. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

The judgment in this case was reversed after a careful and somewhat extended discussion of the points involved, by Justice Burnett (10 Cal. App. Dec. 45). Upon the petition of plaintiff a rehearing was ordered and the cause is again before us for consideration.

In our former opinion we held that the board of supervisors was without jurisdiction to' create the district, for the reason that there was a failure to publish the petition for its organization for the statutory period; and, further, that the validity of the organization could be attacked in this action. Since the opinion was filed the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Dean v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Keech v. JoplinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. People v. La RueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Seccombe v. RoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Coe v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Fisher v. Pioneer Construction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  5. McPhee v. Reclamation Dist. No. 765California Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API