Coe v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
In this action plaintiff attacks the proceedings had and taken under the provisions of the Municipal Annexation Act of 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 577), and amendments thereto, for the annexation of certain territory, known as the city of Sawtelle, to the city of Los Angeles.
To the complaint, which asks that the defendants be enjoined and restrained from further proceedings in the matter, that the election thereon be declared null and of no effect, and that the action of the city of Los Angeles, purporting to have been had pursuant to the provisions of said municipal act, be declared void and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tulare Irrigation District v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Keech v. JoplinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People ex rel. Adams v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People ex rel. Warren v. YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- American Distilling Co. v. City Council of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- City of Campbell v. MoskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Taylor v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- San Ysidro Irrigation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Henderson v. School District No. 44Montana Supreme Court · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.