Keech v. Joplin
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. H. C. Head, B. T. Williams, and Hutton & Williams, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment in mandamus directing him to pay to the plaintiff the sum of five hundred dollars out of the money in his hands as county treasurer belonging to the general fund of the Newbert Protection District, in satisfaction of a warrant for that sum issued to the plaintiff by the directors of said district.
The appeal was taken to the district court of appeal for the second district. The fund of the district, alleged to be in defendant’s hands and applicable to the payment of the plaintiff’s warrant, was raised by taxation of the property within the district. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Conant v. ConantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Appeal of S. O. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Quint v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Reclamation District No. 542 v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Perry v. AmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Dunn v. MUNICIPAL COURT FOR EUREKA JUDICIAL DISTRICTCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- American Distilling Co. v. City Council of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re the Admission of WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- In Re Proceeding to Validate Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment Number SixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Taylor v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.