Seccombe v. Roe
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County discharging an attachment. Gavin W. Craig, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. ■
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.
This action was to recover the balance due upon a promissory note originally secured by a deed of trust; it being alleged that upon default in the payment of the note by defendants the property described in the deed of trust was sold and the net proceeds derived from said sale applied upon such note. An affidavit was filed with the complaint herein sufficient in form to authorize the issuance of a writ of attachment, which writ was issued and levied upon the property of defendants. Thereafter defendants moved to discharge the attachment upon the ground that the statements contained in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Early v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Market National Bank v. Pacific National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Townsend v. TallantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Mersfelder v. SpringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. Cherry CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Little v. CFS Service Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Holland v. Pendleton Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Glass v. BenkertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Security-First National Bank of LA v. CryerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Davies v. RamsdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.