Legal Opinion
612 SOUTH LLC v. Laconic Limited Partnership
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 25, 2010No. D056646PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McINTYRE, J.
In this case, a bondholder sought and obtained a judgment ordering the foreclosure and sale of property subject to a water district bond issued under the provisions of the Improvement Act of 1911 (the 1911 Act; Sts. & Hy. Code, § 5000 et seq.) and the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (the 1913 Act; Sts. & Hy. Code, § 10000 et seq.). (Undesignated statutory references are to the Streets and Highways Code.) The property owner appeals from that part of the judgment ordering (1) a personal deficiency judgment against it and (2) the award of $139,516 in attorney fees to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Santa Clara County Open Space AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Melendrez v. D & I INVESTMENT, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Jordan v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- OC Interior Services, LLC v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. CasasolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Active Properties, LLC v. CabreraAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
- Hardie v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- In re ZubenkoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.