Legal Opinion
Melendrez v. D & I INVESTMENT, INC.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 29, 2005No. H027098PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
Miguel and Maria Melendrez (Borrowers) lost their Watson-ville home through a nonjudicial foreclosure sale in July 2001, approximately eight months after their loan default. The residence was purchased by a third party, defendant Royal Realty (Buyer). Borrowers thereafter sued to set aside the trustee’s sale and to cancel the trustee’s deed. They claimed that the sale was in violation of a repayment agreement (which included a conditional agreement to postpone the sale) with their lender, Washington Mutual Bank, N.A. (Lender), and thus violated Civil Code section 2924g,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Moeller v. Chun-Yen LienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Nguyen v. CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Knapp v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Lona v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Mabry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Herrera v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Debrunner v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 2012
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.