Legal Opinion
Los Angeles Unified School District v. Casasola
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 5, 2010No. B215465PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SUZUKAWA, J.
Respondent Los Angeles Unified School District (the District) acquired by eminent domain property on which appellants Rudy and Teresa Casasola (the Casasolas) operated a small business. The Casasolas relocated their business to- a new, larger property and spent nearly $1.4 million moving their equipment and repurposing the new property to accommodate their business. They then sought reimbursement from the District for their relocation expenses. The District paid the Casasolas $224,252 in moving and reestablishment expenses, but rejected the remainder of the claim.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Dotson v. Amgen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Community Redevelopment Agency v. AbramsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- L. A. Cnty. Metro. Transp. Auth. v. Yum Yum Donut Shops, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Hansen's Truck Stop, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Hammer v. Hammer CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Los Angeles County Metropolitan etc. v. Yum Yum Donut ShopsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Los Angeles County Metropolitan etc. v. Yum Yum Donut ShopsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.