Legal Opinion

Fujitsu General America, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 15, 2000No. Consol 98-08-02748PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POGUE, Judge.

Plaintiff Fujitsu General America, Inc. (“Fujitsu”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT Rule 56. 1 Specifically, Fujitsu moves this Court to order the U.S. Customs Service (“Customs”) to refund to Fujitsu all antidumping duties and interest assessed by Customs on certain of Fujitsu’s entries upon liquidation. 2 Fujitsu claims that it is entitled to an antidumping duty refund because the entries in issue were “deemed liquidated,” or liquidated by operation of law, not at the rate assessed by Customs, but “at the rate of duty, value, quantity, and amount of duty…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fujitsu General America, Inc. (Successor-In-Interest to Teknika Electronics Corp.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Norsk Hydro Canada Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  3. American International Chemical, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API