Ford Motor Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge:
I
INTRODUCTION
Defendants United States of America, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection move to dismiss Plaintiff Ford Motor Company’s Second Amended Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Doc. No. 74 (“Defendants’ Motion”); Defendants’ Memorandum of Support of Its Motion to Dismiss, Doc. No. 74 at 9-25 (“Defendants’ Memo”). Because Plaintiffs claims are ripe and within the court’s 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i) jurisdiction, Defendants’ Motion is DENIED.
II
BACKGROUND
A “drawback” is a refund of duties…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Chemsol, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- United States v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017