Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 22, 2010No. 09-00151PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARMAN, Judge:

Plaintiff Ford Motor Company (“Ford” or “Plaintiff’) brought this action asking the Court to declare that ten entries (“Entries” or “Subject Entries”) of Jaguar brand vehicles imported from the United Kingdom are deemed liquidated by operation of law, and that Ford is entitled to duty refunds on these entries from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”). (Second Amended Compl. for Declaratory And Injunctive Relief (“2d Am. Compl.”) 1-2.) Defendants (collectively, the “United States”) moved to dismiss this case, asserting that for certain entries the statute of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Pharma Ag and Novartis International Pharmaceutical Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  2. Ford Motor Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API