Texas Panhandle Gas Co. v. Thompson
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
A continuation of the controversy which has long been going on ' in the Panhandle gas field, this litigation has for its background the same familiar figures, the same interests, the same general -issues. Canadian River Gas Co. v. Terrell (D. C.) 4 F. Supp. 222; Texoma Natural Gas Co. v. Terrell et al. (D. C.) 2 F. Supp. 168; Texoma Natural Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission (D. C.) 59 F.(2d) 750; Sneed v. Phillips Petroleum Co. (C. C. A.) 76 F.(2d) 785. Here, as before, in the favorable situation of the pipe line companies , as to markets for their gas for Light and fuel…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- People's Petroleum Producers, Inc. v. SterlingDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1932
- Amazon Petroleum Corporation v. Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1934
- Texoma Natural Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission of TexasDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Consolidated Gas Utilities Corporation v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1936
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sunray Oil Co. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1936