Legal Opinion

People's Petroleum Producers, Inc. v. Sterling

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided July 19, 1932No. 365, 386, 389, 392-396, 408PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

In these cases the parties have agreed that a temporary restraining order, issued against the so-called martial law defendants R. S. Sterling, W. W. Sterling, Jacob E. Wolters, and L. S. Davidson, is to remain in force, further orders as to them to abide the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States on the Constantin appeal. The cases are before ns now for action on the application of plaintiffs for a temporary injunction against the Railroad Commission, the Attorney General, et al. In their last analysis, they present another stand by some of tbe producers…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Amazon Petroleum Corporation v. Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1934
  2. Griswold v. the President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  3. Park 'N Fly of Texas, Inc. v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
  4. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. of Texas v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1933
  5. People's Petroleum Producers, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API