Legal Opinion

Burford v. Sun Oil Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 21, 1943No. Nos. 495, 496PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court 1

319 U.S. 315 (1943)

BURFORD ET AL.

v.

SUN OIL CO. ET AL.[*]

No. 495.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued February 8, 9, 1943.

Reargued April 14, 15, 1943.

Decided May 24, 1943.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

Messrs. James P. Hart and Ed Roy Simmons, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, with whom Mr. Gerald C. Mann, Attorney General, was on the brief, for petitioners in No. 495 and respondents in No. 496.

Mr. J.A. Rauhut argued the cause on the original argument for the Sun Oil Co. and on the reargument for the Sun Oil Co. et al.; Mr. J.B. Robertson argued the cause…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Black; Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API