Legal Opinion

Texoma Natural Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided June 8, 1932No. 412-415PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEST, District Judge.

The enforcement of an act of the Legislature is restrained, on plaintiffs’ petitions, as in violation of the Federal Constitution, awaiting consideration of a three-judge court on prayers for interlocutory injunctions. USCA, tit. 28, § 380. The court so constituted sits in hearing. The cases are consolidated. The required diversity of citizenship of the parties and values of matters in controversy are apparent, and^he jurisdiction of the court is not questioned. The Com mon. Purchaser Act, regulating oil and gas pipe lines, was passed by tlie Forty-Second Legislature of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Railroad Commission of Texas v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Standard Oil Company of Texas v. Lopeno Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. of Texas v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1933
  5. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Permian Basin Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API