Legal Opinion

GST Tucson Lightwave, Inc. v. City of Tucson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 22, 1997No. 2 CA-CV 96-0092PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Presiding Judge.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff GST Tucson Lightwave (Light-wave) provides telephone services in competition with local telephone companies. Generally, access to long distance carriers is provided by the local telephone company. Lightwave, a competitive access provider, uses fiberoptic cable to provide digital communications between a customer and a long distance carrier.

In July 1994, the City of Tucson granted Lightwave a 25-year non-exclusive license to install fiberoptic cable for the purpose of providing long distance telecommunication service…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Parks v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Knoxville Water Co. v. KnoxvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Motel 6 Operating Ltd. Partnership v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Wonders v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. Wonders v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API