GST Tucson Lightwave, Inc. v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Presiding Judge.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff GST Tucson Lightwave (Light-wave) provides telephone services in competition with local telephone companies. Generally, access to long distance carriers is provided by the local telephone company. Lightwave, a competitive access provider, uses fiberoptic cable to provide digital communications between a customer and a long distance carrier.
In July 1994, the City of Tucson granted Lightwave a 25-year non-exclusive license to install fiberoptic cable for the purpose of providing long distance telecommunication service…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Parks v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Knoxville Water Co. v. KnoxvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Motel 6 Operating Ltd. Partnership v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Wonders v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Wonders v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004