Legal Opinion

Isenberg v. Sherman

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 12560PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Appellants, after an adverse final determination by this court of the above-entitled ease, have petitioned to recall the remittitur on the ground that “the order of judgment was improvidently granted under false suggestions and under a mistake as to the facts of the case, practiced upon the Supreme Court of the State of California in procuring its judgment and upon the counsel representing the appellants herein”. The appeal on the merits was decided April 30, 1931. (212 Cal. 454 [298 Pac. 1004].) Appellants petitioned for a rehearing, which was denied with opinion on May 28, 1931.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commercial Trust Co. of NJ v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Rowland v. KreyenhagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. In re Estate of LevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Trumpler v. TrumplerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Island v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  4. In Re RothrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. In Re MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API