Legal Opinion
Miller v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2010No. Civil Action 09-513 (PLF)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mark Miller is a prisoner in federal custody. He filed a pro se complaint asserting a variety of statutory and constitutional claims against the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) and two BOP employees in their personal capacities for a variety of alleged acts and injuries. The defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint under several provisions of Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or, in the alternative, under Rule 56 for summary judgment. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Miller was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Harrison v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Chandler v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Brown v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Shah v. SamuelsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2015
- Allen v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.