Legal Opinion
Brown v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 22, 2011No. Civil Action 09-2364 (RMU)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss. The pro se plaintiff, a federal prisoner, commenced this action under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., challenging his designation to a low-security Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) facility. Because the court lacks jurisdiction to hear the plaintiffs claim, the court grants the defendants’ motion.
II.FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
After entering a guilty plea to numerous drug and.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rush v. SamuelsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Shah v. SamuelsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2015
- Carr v. BOPDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
- Doe v. McHenryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Doss v. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.