Legal Opinion

Mannington v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided June 13, 1910No. 1,527PublishedCited by 29 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Howard D. Mannington, Fred H. Schoedinger, and Ralph E. Westfall, against the Hocking Valley Railway Company and the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company. On motion by defendants to dissolve temporary restraining order and by complainants for preliminary injunction. Order modified, and injunction granted in modified form. This case is hero on removal.

Read the full summary

In Equity. Suit by Howard D. Mannington, Fred H. Schoedinger, and Ralph E. Westfall, against the Hocking Valley Railway Company and the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company. On motion by defendants to dissolve temporary restraining order and by complainants for preliminary injunction. Order modified, and injunction granted in modified form. This case is hero on removal. The defendant, an Ohio corporation, was organized in 1899 to take over the Columbus, Hocking Valley & Toledo Railway Company,, then under foreclosure, and all of its property of whatever kind. To reduce the fixed charges, the…

1Opinion of the CourtSater, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The petition and bond for removal to this court, which were filed anti *140brought to the state court’s attention soon after it rendered! its opinion refusing to modify the restraining order and granting a temporary .injunction, are, and are conceded to be, sufficient in substance and form. An order for removal was presented to it for allowance; but, instead of allowing such order or determining the sufficiency of the petition and bond, the court proceeded to appoint receivers for the defendant, the Hocking Valley Railway Company. The entry overruling the…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Railroad Co. v. KoontzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Blakeslee v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Fox v. Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Speed v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  4. State ex rel. Mills v. American Surety Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Martin v. Bankers' Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1916

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API