Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martin v. Henderson

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1953No. Sac. 6280Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent.

These cases were.correctly decided by the District Court of Appeal, Third District (see Martin v. Lampton, (Cal.App.) 240 P.2d 21) and I adopt the views there expressed. However, I desire to comment on the position taken by the majority here.

The record discloses that the state employees here involved worked overtime at the express command of their superiors with the promise of time off for the overtime, yet the majority denies them compensation therefor on the grounds that there is no statutory authority for the payment of such overtime or promise to pay it, and that as to their…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Nelson v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. City of L.A. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API