Flynn v. Gorton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOVILLE, P. J.
The trial court sustained a demurrer to John Flynn’s cross-complaint without leave to amend after determining that a prior judicial arbitration award against Flynn was res judicata. Because we hold a judicial arbitration award has no conclusive effect on issues raised in a subsequent proceeding on a different cause of action, we reverse the judgment. As we shall explain, Flynn’s action was not barred by res judicata because his cross-complaint stated a different cause of action than that involved in the judicial arbitration proceeding. Nor was Flynn barred under the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Busick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Frommhagen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Carroll v. Puritan Leasing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Dorrance v. LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Kelly v. Vons Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Rymer v. HaglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.