Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Gorton

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1989No. G004819PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOVILLE, P. J.

The trial court sustained a demurrer to John Flynn’s cross-complaint without leave to amend after determining that a prior judicial arbitration award against Flynn was res judicata. Because we hold a judicial arbitration award has no conclusive effect on issues raised in a subsequent proceeding on a different cause of action, we reverse the judgment. As we shall explain, Flynn’s action was not barred by res judicata because his cross-complaint stated a different cause of action than that involved in the judicial arbitration proceeding. Nor was Flynn barred under the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Busick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Frommhagen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Carroll v. Puritan Leasing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Dorrance v. LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Kelly v. Vons Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Rymer v. HaglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API