Legal Opinion

State v. Digesti

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 10, 2014No. 12FE0233; A152522PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, (Counts 1 and 2), ORS 163.427,1 2raising five assignments of error. We reject without discussion defendant’s third and fourth assignments of error. In his first and second assignments of error, defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on Count 1 and Count 2, respectively, because “ [¶] orcefully keeping a door closed in an effort to prevent the victim from leaving [the bathroom] is not ‘physical force’ within the meaning of ORS 163.305(2),[2] the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. MarshallOregon Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WiltseOregon Supreme Court · 2024
  2. State v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. BelenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. WaldbilligCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API