Legal Opinion

State v. Waldbillig

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 2016No. 10FE1396MS, 10FE1180MS; A151450 (Control), A151451, A151453PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

In this consolidated criminal appeal, defendant challenges his convictions for second-degree kidnapping, coercion, and two counts each of first-degree sodomy and first-degree sexual abuse.1 He asserts 10 assignments of error. We write to address only defendant’s second and third assignments of error, and reject the rest without written discussion.2

In his second assignment, defendant asserts that the trial court’s jury instructions failed to inform the jury that to convict defendant of first-degree sodomy, the state had to prove that he knowingly subjected the victim to forcible compulsion.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KerneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. O'Hara v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Patton v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API