Legal Opinion

Fruit Boat Market v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1953PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether there is any credible evidence, which, if unexplained, would support the-finding of the commission that at the time of Mooney’s injury he was engaged in performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment. Hills Dry Goods Co. v. Industrial Comm. (1935), 217 Wis. 76, 85, 258 N. W. 336; and Motor Transport Co. v. Public Service Comm. (1953), 263 Wis. 31, 46, 56 N. W. (2d) 548.

Fruit Boat Market (hereinafter referred to as “Fruit Boat”) is a Wisconsin corporation and operates an open-air retail fruit and vegetable market on a seasonal basis. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Toy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hills Dry Goods Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Gant v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Motor Transport Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Hipke v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Wagner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. American Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Queen City Furniture Company v. HindsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Shillinglaw v. Owen Shillinglaw Fuel CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API